Product design case study · 0→1 concept

The hard part isn't getting online.
It's what happens next.

Website builders help millions of people launch a site in minutes. But most small-business owners publish once and then go quiet — the site goes stale, results never come, and they don't renew. Momentum is an AI growth companion that turns "I'm live, now what?" into one clear next move every week.

Focus metric
Renewal / retention
Role
Lead product designer
Scope
Research → ship → iterate

⚠️ Independent concept & portfolio work. Product names, brand cues, and metrics are illustrative and used to demonstrate design process.

My role
Lead Product Designer — research, UX, UI, prototype
Timeline
6-week 0→1 concept sprint
Team
1 designer + PM & 2 engineers (proposed)
Platform
Responsive web · in-dashboard
Tools
Figma · HTML/CSS/JS

Summary

The problem

New site → silence. Owners don't know what to do after launch, see no results, and churn before renewal.

The insight

They don't need more features. They need one confident next step and proof it's working.

The solution

An AI companion that ships one prioritized, 2-minute "growth move" per week and shows its impact.

The bet

Habit + visible progress in weeks 1–4 → activation → higher first-year renewal.

01 · The problem

People launch fast, then fall off a cliff

Modern website builders have made getting online almost frictionless. But launching a website is a beginning, not a finish line. For a first-time small-business owner, the moment right after "Publish" is where the excitement quietly turns into overwhelm:

  • "It's live… is anyone even seeing it?"
  • "There are 50 things I could do. Which one actually matters?"
  • "I don't have time to learn SEO, ads, and analytics."

The result is a predictable pattern: a burst of activity at launch, then weeks of silence. No visible results means no perceived value — and for a subscription business, no perceived value shows up months later as a non-renewal.

Where value quietly leaks (illustrative funnel)
  • Site published100%
  • Returned to edit within 30 days61%
  • Made a growth improvement (SEO, content, integrations)34%
  • Saw measurable traffic or leads22%
  • Renewed after year 1the metric

The steepest drop is between publishing and improving. That gap is the design opportunity.

02 · Research

How I'd earn conviction

This is a self-directed concept — there's no research behind it yet. What follows is the study I'd run before asking a team to build it: mixing qualitative depth with quantitative breadth so the direction would be defensible to both design and business stakeholders, not just a pretty hunch.

🗣️

Planned: 12 customer interviews

First-time site owners, 2–16 weeks post-launch, asked to narrate "what did you do after you published?" — not yet run.

📊

Planned: Amplitude funnels & cohorts

Would map publish → edit → improve → renew, segmented by tenure to find where cohorts stall — not yet run.

🎥

Planned: HotJar sessions & heatmaps

Would watch post-launch sessions to see whether owners open the dashboard, scan, and leave without acting — not yet run.

📥

Planned: support & cancellation reasons

Would tag "didn't get results / not worth it" from cancellation surveys and chat transcripts — not yet run.

Four assumptions this concept rests on

01

Choice paralysis, not laziness

The assumption: owners are motivated but frozen by too many equally-shouting options, and want a ranked to-do, not a toolbox.

02

Progress must be felt

Traffic takes weeks; motivation lasts days. The assumption: without an early proxy for progress, people give up before results arrive.

03

Trust the effort, not the jargon

The assumption: "SEO," "meta description," "backlinks" cause shutdown, while plain outcomes ("get found on Google") keep people moving.

04

Small & scheduled beats big & someday

The assumption: a 2-minute weekly nudge fits real capacity far better than a "growth checklist" of 40 items.

Who I designed for

M

Maya · the side-hustler

Handmade candles · 0 web experience

Goal: turn her Instagram followers into orders.

Pain: "I built the site in a weekend, then had no idea what to do Monday."

Momentum win: one doable task a week she can trust.

D

Diego · the local pro

Plumber · time-poor, results-driven

Goal: get phone calls from his area.

Pain: no time to learn marketing; wants proof it's worth paying for.

Momentum win: visible impact tied to real leads.

P

Priya · the small agency

Manages 8 client sites

Goal: show clients ongoing value each month.

Pain: repetitive optimization work across sites.

Momentum win: a shareable progress story per client.

Scenarios this concept targets

These aren't transcripts — no interviews or sessions have actually been run yet (see §Impact). They're the moments the concept is designed to change, written as scenarios so the problem stays concrete.

“I spent the whole weekend building the site, hit publish — and then just sat there. Nobody tells you what comes next.”

Illustrative scenario · owner, three weeks after launch

“I don’t have time to become a marketer. Just tell me the one thing worth doing today.”

Illustrative scenario · time-poor local business owner

“There are twenty buttons on that dashboard. I open it, feel a bit stupid, and close it again.”

Illustrative scenario · owner facing choice paralysis

“I paid for a full year. Two months in with no visitors, I assumed it wasn’t working and let it lapse.”

Illustrative scenario · the churn this concept targets
03 · The solution

One next move. Every week. Proof it worked.

Momentum lives inside the website builder dashboard. It reframes "growth" from an overwhelming toolbox into a calm, guided rhythm — and it makes progress visible long before traffic shows up.

🎯

Rank, don't dump

AI scores every possible improvement by impact ÷ effort for this specific business, and surfaces just the top move.

Two minutes, done-for-you

Each move is pre-drafted (copy, keywords, layout). The owner reviews and approves — they never start from a blank page.

📈

Make progress felt now

A Momentum Score rises the moment a move ships — an honest early proxy while real traffic builds.

🤝

Plain language, real outcomes

"Help people find you on Google" — never "optimize meta tags." The jargon lives underneath, on demand.

The core loop

  1. 1

    Suggest

    AI picks the highest-leverage next move for your site.

  2. 2

    Do (in 2 min)

    Review a pre-filled change and approve — or tweak it.

  3. 3

    See it land

    Momentum Score jumps; the win is logged to your streak.

  4. 4

    Measure

    Weeks later, Momentum ties moves back to real traffic & leads.

The weekly nudge — one calm touchpoint, not a firehose

Momentum only reaches out once a week, in plain language, always leading with the outcome. Restraint is the feature.

Email · Mondays, 9am

Your Monday move is ready 🌱

Hi Maya — this week’s highest-impact 2-minute move:

Help more people in Lisbon find your candles on Google.

We’ve already drafted it. You just review and approve.

Review this week’s move →
Push · gentle reminder
Momentum

1 quick win is waiting. Keep your 3-week streak alive 🔥

Momentum · milestone

🎉 Your homepage now shows up for 3 local searches. That’s real progress.

Cadence caps at one nudge/week. Miss two in a row and Momentum quiets down instead of escalating.

04 · Interactive prototype

Try it — this is live, not a screenshot

Complete a growth move and watch the Momentum Score, streak, and projected results respond. Everything below is real, clickable UI.

The live prototype below starts at 41 (Maya's current score after 3 prior moves). The hero card shows the 72 target after completing this week's growth moves.

Momentum
candlesbymaya.comM
41 Momentum

Nice work, Maya 👋

You're building momentum. 1 quick move today keeps your streak alive.

🔥 2-week streak · 3 moves shipped
Projected monthly visitors 120 baseline

Your growth moves

Ranked by impact for your business · pick one to start

Your momentum over time

3Moves shipped
41Momentum score
2Week streak
120Proj. visitors/mo

What's working

Momentum connects the moves you ship back to real outcomes, so you can see what's paying off.

Momentum recommends next

Complete a move from This week to see personalized recommendations.

Prototype scope: interactions, state, and motion are functional to demonstrate the experience. Copy and data are illustrative.

05 · Design system

Built on reusable, token-driven components

Momentum extends an established SaaS design language rather than reinventing it — new patterns (growth-move cards, the Momentum ring, streaks) are documented so the design guild can adopt them.

Color tokens

Violet 600brand / primary Violet 400accents Growthsuccess / progress Sparkstreaks / highlight Inktext Surfacebackgrounds

Type scale

Display

Heading

Body strong

Body — Inter, generous line-height for readability

Overline / kicker

Components

High impact 2 min ▲ +14

Radii, elevation, and motion are tokenized (--radius, --shadow, --ease) so components stay consistent across the app.

06 · Impact & measurement

How I'd know it worked

Before projecting business impact, I pressure-tested the concept with real users — because a confident story means nothing if people can't actually use it.

The pass mark I’d set before testing

Planned: 9 moderated usability sessions · target users (first-time SMB owners) · clickable prototype — not yet run

Writing the pass mark down before the first session is what stops a usability test turning into a hunt for encouragement. Miss any of these and the concept goes back, not the participant.

8/9(target) complete a growth move unprompted in the first session
<3 min(target) time to first improvement
7/9(target) would open a weekly nudge · 0 call one-per-week “spammy”
2(reserved) fix rounds budgeted before re-testing

To be clear about what this is: a self-directed concept. I’ve run no interviews and no usability sessions, and queried no analytics. Every number on this page is a target I set in advance, not a result I measured.

Where I'd point the metrics next

+31% post-launch improvement rate (N. star, projected)
+9pts first-year renewal (primary business goal, projected)
4.6★ "this helped me" in-product rating
-18% "didn't get results" cancellations

The measurement plan

  • North star: weekly active improvers (owners who ship ≥1 move/week).
  • Leading: move completion rate, streak retention, Momentum Score growth.
  • Lagging: 30/90-day activation → first-year renewal.
  • Guardrail: "helpful vs. nagging" sentiment — kill nudges that annoy.

How I'd learn & iterate

  • Amplitude: funnel + cohort tracking on the core loop.
  • HotJar: watch first-week sessions; heatmap the move cards.
  • Experiments: A/B the ranking model & notification cadence.
  • Ongoing research: monthly interviews with active + churned users.

All figures are illustrative projections framed as hypotheses to demonstrate how I set and instrument goals — not claimed results.

07 · Reflection

What I'd watch, cut, and do next

The hardest trade-off

Automation vs. ownership. Fully auto-applying changes boosts completion but erodes trust and learning. I chose review-and-approve — a little more friction, a lot more confidence.

The risk I'd de-risk first

Notification fatigue. One weekly move is deliberately restrained; I'd instrument sentiment early and be ruthless about pausing nudges that annoy.

Where I'd take it next

A benchmark ("sites like yours") and a Priya-facing multi-site view — turning Momentum into a retention engine for agencies too.